That might have been the beginning of the idea, and I love the graphics in
the article and on their site, but I'm looking for something based on
bibliographies of printed works, not scholarly communication. Digital
Humanities might be a good model now that i think of it
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Sheila M. Morrissey <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Matt --
> Do you mean something like this?
>
> http://chronicle.com/article/Maps-of-Citations-Uncover-New/128938/?sid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en
>
> Sheila
>
> Sheila M. Morrissey
> Senior Research Developer
> ITHAKA
> 100 Campus Drive
> Suite 100
> Princeton NJ 08540
> 609-986-2221
> [log in to unmask]
>
> ITHAKA (www.ithaka.org) is a not-for-profit organization that helps the
> academic community use digital technologies to preserve the scholarly
> record and to advance research and teaching in sustainable ways. We
> provide innovative services that benefit higher education, including Ithaka
> S+R, JSTOR, and Portico.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Matt Amory
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 9:41 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [CODE4LIB] "Citation Analysis" - like projects for print resources
>
> Is anyone involved with, or does anyone know of any project to extract and
> aggregate bibliography data from individual works to produce some kind of
> "most-cited" authors list across a collection? Local/Network/Digital/OCLC
> or historic?
>
> Sorry to be vague, but I'm trying to get my head around whether this is a
> tired old idea or worth pursuing...
>
>
> --
> Matt Amory
> (917) 771-4157
> [log in to unmask]
> <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/matt-amory/8/515/239>
>
--
Matt Amory
(917) 771-4157
[log in to unmask]
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/matt-amory/8/515/239
|