On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Bill Dueber <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I was a strong proponent of NDJ at one point, but I've grown less strident
> and more weary since then.
>
> Brad Baxter has a good overview of some options[1]. I'm assuming it's a
> given we'd all prefer to work with valid JSON files if the pain-point can
> be brought down far enough.
>
> A couple years have passed since we first talked about this stuff, and the
> state of JSON pull-parsers is better than it once was:

For completeness, I've added 'ndj' support to my proof of concept:

http://search.cpan.org/dist/MARC-Utils-MARC2MARC_in_JSON/

FWIW :-)

Brad