With the way code4lib works, you realize you just committed yourself
to writing them down, right? :)
-Mike
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 15:51, Wilfred Drew <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> If it is that important, it should be written down!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris Cormack
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 3:36 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Unwritten Rules, formerly Pandering for votes for code4lib sessions
>
> On 2 December 2011 09:33, Munson, Doris <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> As a relative newcomer to this list, I second the idea that any offenders be contacted off list with an explanation of any unwritten rules they unknowingly violate. I suggest this becomes one of c4l's unwritten rules.
>>
>>
> I totally just unwrote that down
>
> Chris
>
|
