... IE 5?!?!?!
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Brig C McCoy <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi...
>
> This is from the last six weeks from one of my public-facing websites.
> Definitely not going to drop MSIE support for the website at this rate:
>
> # #reqs #pages browser
> 1 18137 827 MSIE
> 8651 437 MSIE/8
> 7400 277 MSIE/9
> 1866 52 MSIE/7
> 193 42 MSIE/6
> 16 16 MSIE/5
> 11 3 MSIE/10
> 2 1809 441 Safari
> 1128 299 Safari/533
> 202 58 Safari/534
> 214 54 Safari/7534
> 79 23 Safari/6533
> 41 4 Safari/530
> 13 3 Safari/531
> 3 906 260 Netscape (compatible)
> 4 1287 182 Firefox
> 442 114 Firefox/13
> 408 34 Firefox/12
> 139 11 Firefox/10
> 163 6 Firefox/3
> 28 6 Firefox/14
> 11 5 Firefox/9
> 6 2 Firefox/4
> 12 2 Firefox/6
> 4 1 Firefox/15
> 8 1 Firefox/7
> 5 1164 175 Chrome
> 718 111 Chrome/19
> 409 61 Chrome/20
> 23 1 Chrome/9
> 4 1 Chrome/10
> 1 1 Chrome/5
>
> ...brig
>
>
>
> On 7/12/2012 9:33 AM, Michael Schofield wrote:
>
>> Ever since Microsoft announced the new IE auto-update policy, the
>> blogosphere is fussing. This is definitely important (and good) news, but
>> sites-Smashing Magazine has three articles on it in the last few days-are
>> really pushing the "drop IE support," and "its literally slowing the
>> internet down." I'm down, but that attitude-especially for libraries-isn't
>> really the right one to have. It is, IMHO, an old view. A smart design
>> strategy with progressive enhancement can deliver content to . everyone -
>> which should be the priority for non-prof / [local-]government web
>> presences
>> over flare. Right?--
>>
> Brig C. McCoy [log in to unmask]
> Network Services Coordinator
> Kansas City, Kansas Public Library
> 625 Minnesota Avenue
> Kansas City, KS 66101
> tel 913-279-2349
> cel 816-885-2700
> fax 913-279-2271
>
|
