I'd buy that shirt.

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Doran, Michael D <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Second the motion to stop beating this dead horse.
>
>
>
> Dang, and I was already working on this 2013 conference t-shirt design...
>
>
>
> [cid:[log in to unmask]]
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>
>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
>
>> Friscia, Michael
>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 7:46 AM
>
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>
>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings!
>
>>
>
>> Second the motion to stop beating this dead horse.
>
>>
>
>> ___________________________________________
>
>> Michael Friscia
>
>> Manager, Digital Library & Programming Services
>
>>
>
>> Yale University Library
>
>> (203) 432-1856
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>
>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]]<mailto:[mailto:[log in to unmask]]> On Behalf Of
>
>> Carol Bean
>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 8:43 AM
>
>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings!
>
>>
>
>> No.
>
>>
>
>> Just no. Vote taken. Preferences noted. Done.
>
>>
>
>> Carol
>
>>
>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>
>>
>
>> On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:50 AM, Graham Triggs <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>
>> wrote:
>
>>
>
>> > On 6 August 2012 13:19, Ed Summers <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
>> >> 150 people responded about whether jobs.code4lib.org posting should
>
>> >> come to the discussion list:
>
>> >>
>
>> >>    yes: 132
>
>> >>    no: 10
>
>> >>    who cares: 8
>
>> >>
>
>> >> 93% in support or agnostic seems to be a good indicator that the
>
>> >> postings should continue to come to the list for now.
>
>> >
>
>> > I'm not entirely convinced about that assessment. I quite readily
>
>> > agree that the jobs should be posted to *a* mailing list, I'm not so
>
>> > sure that it should be this mailing list.
>
>> >
>
>> > It's been discussed about filtering the jobs sent to the list, but I
>
>> > already filter the code4lib mailing list into a tag. It's been a bit
>
>> > of a faff, but I've subdivided the filtering so that I can get the
>
>> > messages sent from jobs@... to go to a different tag. But then Ed
>
>> > replied to one, so now it appears in both tags, and because I'm using
>
>> > Gmail, it takes the whole thread with it.
>
>> >
>
>> > So filtering really isn't a solution.
>
>> >
>
>> > Rather than just asking whether jobs should come to this mailing list,
>
>> > maybe we can ask whether a separate mailing list should be set up,
>
>> > specifically for jobs. The two mailing lists could be cross promoted
>
>> > (e.g. a standard footer), and people can choose whether they want or
>
>> > don't want to receive them. And we can still have
>
>> > discussions/follow-ups about those jobs on that mailing list.
>
>> >
>
>> > Even though the vast majority of the postings aren't applicable to me,
>
>> > I would probably still sign up to a separate jobs mailing list as it
>
>> > is of interest - but I would at least then be able to keep that
>
>> > separate from the main discussions, which is something I can't
>
>> > effectively do right now.
>
>> >
>
>> > G