Yes, from the link:
"We decided to go with [Archivist Toolkit / ] ArchivesSpace for
archival description, Aeon for patron/financial management, and
Fedora/Islandora for our digital asset management system (DAMS). A
unified interface layer wasn’t a critical component for us in the
As she said, "there is no 'one Archival system to rule them all.' You
will probably have to use more than one piece of software."
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Cary Gordon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I believe that Islandora serves as a front-end Fedora/Duraspace.
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Kevin S. Clarke <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> That link she posted says they've decided to go with Islandora for the
>> end-user display.
>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Steve Cherry <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> One thing about Archivits Toolkit is that it has no end-user display, so if
>>> providing your data to patrons is a goal I'd suggest Archon
>>> On 8/9/12 4:42 PM, Laura Smart wrote:
>>>> We've done a very recent analysis of archival systems and decided upon
>>>> a new architecture based on our local functional specs. This was
>>>> greatly informed by the CLIR report. I blogged a bit more detail on
>>>> the solutions we've selected and are in the process of implementing at
>>>> http://library.caltech.edu/laura/?p=299 . Re: ArchivesSpace - our
>>>> plan is to implement Archivists Toolkit before ArchivesSpace is
>>>> released and rely upon the migration assistance they intend to provide
>>>> to the community.
>>>> FWIW - there is no "one Archival system to rule them all." You will
>>>> probably have to use more than one piece of software.
>>> Steve Cherry
>>> Electronic Services Librarian
>>> The Catholic University of America
> Cary Gordon
> The Cherry Hill Company