That would really dumb down the metadata. DC is very limited.

Nate
---------------------------------------------------------------
Nate Trail
---------------------------------------------------------------
Network Development and MARC  Standards Office
Technology Policy Mail stop 4402
Library Services 
Library of Congress 
202-707-2193
[log in to unmask]



-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of john passmore
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 10:28 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] PBCore 2.0 to MARC XML?

Ah, that makes sense. I could try  PBCore>Dublin Core>MARC 21.


On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Tom Keays <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> PBCore lists a bunch of crosswalk mapping schemes that they've identified.
>
> http://www.pbcore.org/PBCore/PBCore_Mappings.html
>
> Some of them are listed but aren't done yet, including a direct 
> mapping to MARC 21. However, a mapping of PBCore to Dublin Core 
> exists, so you could probably get there by using DC as an intermediate.
>
> http://www.pbcore.org/PBCore/mappings/PBCore-DublinCore_Mapping.html
>
> They also identify the Metadata Advisory Group of the MIT Libraries as 
> a source of mapping information, so you could possibly consult them 
> for help in this project.
>
> http://libraries.mit.edu/guides/subjects/metadata/mappings.html
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:15 PM, john passmore <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Before I start reinventing the wheel, does anyone know of any 
> > stylesheets out there that convert PBCore 2.0 XML 
> > <http://pbcore.org> to MARC XML<http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/>?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > John
> > WNYC Archives
> >
>