How about mapping PBCore to the CIDOC-CRM as a hub format then going into MARC?
http://www.cidoc-crm.org/crm_mappings.html - I don't see a PBCore mapping yet, but it should be doable.
You may have to use the FRBRoo extension (http://www.cidoc-crm.org/frbr_inro.html) for some fields.
The beauty of doing it that way would be that your intermediate data would also have a longer term usability if you convert to another schema later on.
Or if your institution is really generous, get them to fund a mapping of PBCore and (the relevant bits of) MARC21 to the VMF: http://www.doi.org/VMF/registering.html and put it out there for everyone (including any DOI registrations) to link to?
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of john passmore
Sent: 06 November 2012 15:28
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] PBCore 2.0 to MARC XML?
Ah, that makes sense. I could try PBCore>Dublin Core>MARC 21.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Tom Keays <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> PBCore lists a bunch of crosswalk mapping schemes that they've identified.
> Some of them are listed but aren't done yet, including a direct
> mapping to MARC 21. However, a mapping of PBCore to Dublin Core
> exists, so you could probably get there by using DC as an intermediate.
> They also identify the Metadata Advisory Group of the MIT Libraries as
> a source of mapping information, so you could possibly consult them
> for help in this project.
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:15 PM, john passmore <[log in to unmask]>
> > Hi,
> > Before I start reinventing the wheel, does anyone know of any
> > stylesheets out there that convert PBCore 2.0 XML
> > <http://pbcore.org> to MARC XML<http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/>?
> > Thanks!
> > John
> > WNYC Archives