I've submitted the request to add my post to the CoC github at
https://github.com/code4lib/antiharassment-policy/issues/25. I have a
couple of other thoughts roaming around my head atm, and might post a
couple of additions/tweaks to what I wrote in the issue thread.

Also, sorry for the typos in the last post. I wrote the post at 6 am
before consuming tea.

Lastly, to end your day...

Puppies: http://animal.discovery.com/tv-shows/puppy-bowl/games-and-more/puppy-cam.htm

and

Kittens: http://animal.discovery.com/tv-shows/too-cute/games-more/kitten-cam.htm

Thanks,
Becky

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Ranti Junus <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> +1 to the proposed approach. Thank you, Becky.
>
>
> ranti.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Mark A. Matienzo
> <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Becky Yoose <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> > So that's my answer. In Real Life people will have opinions about how
>> > the CoC is enforced. People will argue that a particular decision was
>> > unfair, and others will say that it didn't go far enough. We really
>> > can't stop people having opinions, but what we could do here is have
>> > constructive discussions that lead to something tangible (affirmation
>> > of decision, change in CoC, modify decision, etc,), instead of
>> > reproducing the comments section of a story on a news site.
>> >
>> > I can add this as a new issue to the CoC Github, as supporting
>> > documentation to the code later today.
>>
>> becky++
>>
>> I like the proposed approach.
>>
>> -mark
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Bulk mail.  Postage paid.