This is good info.

I guess I will build out a test Drupal integration, unless I can talk
someone else into doing it.

Cary

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Tom Johnson <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I would add that it generally does better for "realtime" applications. If
> your index is updated often, ES *might* perform much better than Solr.
>
> http://blog.socialcast.com/realtime-search-solr-vs-elasticsearch/
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > So the main advantages to ES over Solr that I can think of offhand are
> the
> > fact that you can store and search on complex JSON documents (that is,
> > documents with nested objects, etc.) making it an effective standalone
> > document database and the fact that it will automatically replicate and
> > shard to other instances using zeroconf.
> >
> > -Ross.
> >
> > On Mar 14, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Cary Gordon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > > I am trying to decide whether we should evaluate it and possibly do a
> > > Drupal integration.
> > >
> > > I know that this is not a trivial question, but, being lazy, I would
> like
> > > to know in what ways it provides services that I can't get from Solr. I
> > > have looked at the comparo cheatsheet —
> http://solr-vs-elasticsearch.com
> > >
> > > Cary
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:59 AM, MJ Suhonos <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Likewise, I've been using it since mid-2010 (0.6.0).  What do you want
> > to
> > >> know about it?
> > >>
> > >> MJ
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cary Gordon
> > > The Cherry Hill Company
> > > http://chillco.com
> >
>



-- 
Cary Gordon
The Cherry Hill Company
http://chillco.com