Thanks, Roy (and others!)
It looks like the 245 is including the $c - dang! I should have been
more specific. I'm mainly interested in the title, which is $a $b -- I'm
looking at the gains and losses of bytes should one implement FRBR. As a
hedge, could I ask what've you got for the 240? that may be closer to
reality.
kc
On 10/16/13 10:57 AM, Roy Tennant wrote:
> I don't even have to fire it up. That's a statistic that we generate
> quarterly (albeit via Hadoop). Here you go:
>
> 100 - 30.3
> 245 - 103.1
> 600 - 41
> 610 - 48.8
> 611 - 61.4
> 630 - 40.8
> 648 - 23.8
> 650 - 35.1
> 651 - 39.6
> 653 - 33.3
> 654 - 38.1
> 655 - 22.5
> 656 - 30.6
> 657 - 27.4
> 658 - 30.7
> 662 - 41.7
>
> Roy
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Sean Hannan <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> That sounds like a request for Roy to fire up the ole OCLC Hadoop.
>>
>> -Sean
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/16/13 1:06 PM, "Karen Coyle" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Anybody have data for the average length of specific MARC fields in some
>>> reasonably representative database? I mainly need 100, 245, 6xx.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> kc
>>>
>>> --
>>> Karen Coyle
>>> [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
>>> m: 1-510-435-8234
>>> skype: kcoylenet
--
Karen Coyle
[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
|