LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  October 2013

CODE4LIB October 2013

Subject:

Re: Usability Person?

From:

Shaun Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:07:12 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (136 lines)

It is nice to see a growing appreciation for UX in our domain.  Michael, 
librarians ARE users, but I understand what you're saying in that 
they've had too much influence, and have unfortunately brought bias to 
the design process that has created obstacles for other users.

Andrew, your original post focused on a Usability person.  The way I see 
it, Usability skills are a subset of User Experience.  If you can hire 
two people, awesome.  If I had to choose one, I would go for a User 
Experience person. It is at least one full-time job, ideally of higher 
rank due to its "big picture" nature.  I like the idea of a usability 
committee or working group, with the UX expert as a chair.

Below are a few skills/abilities of my ideal User Experience Designer. 
It's unlikely you will get them all in one candidate, but it may give 
you an idea of which niches you need to fill, given your current team:

* Creativity and Audacity *
Design is inherently mixed with organization and culture, and in order 
to solve design problems they have to be willing to rethink and change 
long-standing traditions and culture.  This person can question 
EVERYTHING without being abrasive.

* Diplomacy and Influence *
You can't do the above without being good at building relationships, 
forming consensus, negotiating, etc.  Ideally the position would have 
enough power in the org to be at the table for major decisions, but then 
again, influence does not always come from hierarchical rank.

* Usability Interviewing, Testing, and Analytics *
Understanding, empathizing with, and advocating for ALL the users of 
your systems is critical, and collecting data to form and back up your 
arguments is a prerequisite. UX people have to talk to users about their 
goals, test ideas with prototypes, and collect and interpret 
stats/analytics. Testing is not only about whether a feature could be 
improved, but whether it should be there at all.  This person can 
identify and prioritize the right problems to solve.

* Visual Thinking/Literacy *
The person should have a good design sense, and be able to put the 
elements and principles of design to work in the idea pitch, information 
architecture, and design process.

* Content Strategy *
What is the overall vision of the org and how is that message delivered? 
  What message is currently being delivered via neglect of an overall 
strategy?  The lack of a content strategy is one reason why so many 
library websites are filled with pages that are piles of links.

* Interaction Design *
In libraries, where budgets can be an issue, this person should be able 
to put together wireframes, prototypes, and final HTML/CSS/JS designs. 
As Tom mentioned, this could be an entirely different, more technical 
position, but it's a great asset if you can find it.

-Shaun
P.S. - Don't feel tied into current position titles. Google has an "Über 
Tech Lead for Search Quality and User Happiness"!

On 10/30/13 12:33 PM, Michael Schofield wrote:
> I think, where budgets allow, this is an increasingly common function / position. I am a Front End Librarian and I oversee development, user experience, and content strategy. I am part of systems but I liaise most often with our Marketing Department [because we have one ... ]. My friend Amanda is literally the User Experience Librarian at the Darien Library, so this is a thing with precedent.
>
> I agree with one of the other commenters that a dedicated UX person makes a world of difference - and, honestly, it's probably better if that person is less librarian than not. The big hurdle we've had to jump across was coming to grips that our librarians aren't users, so their weigh-in on content and services is skewed toward the jargon-y, mega-search-fields, we're-not-google-and-we-are-proud opinion.
>
> Staying on top of usability, accessibility, content strategy, dev, and performance [because a fast website is integral to a good user experience] is a full-time job. It's the kind of job you do outside of the 40-hour week. If you can get away with it, don't bundle this stuff in with other major roles.
>
> Organizationally, this person or team should be afforded a little bit of autonomy from the other departments. Design committees--especially in higher-ed--are power struggles, and it benefits no one when the user-experience people/person can be pressured into bad design decisions.
>
> Oh, and pay them well :) :) :).
>
> // Michael!
>
> I write about the web and front-end librarianship at www.ns4lib.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ken Varnum
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 12:00 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Usability Person?
>
> We are exceptionally fortunate to have a 3-person User Experience department to support the developers who work on the website, the catalog, the digital library, and the repository.
> http://www.lib.umich.edu/library-information-technology/user-experience-department
>
>
> --
> Ken Varnum | Web Systems Manager | MLibrary - University of Michigan - Ann Arbor [log in to unmask] | @varnum | http://www.lib.umich.edu/users/varnum |
> 734-615-3287
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Tom Cramer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> We have been lucky to have a full time interaction designer within our
>> library IT group for about 6 years. It makes a world of difference in
>> the quality of our products; it also helps with letting the engineers
>> focus on engineering, and the librarians focus on being librarians
>> (rather than trying to design for patrons).
>>
>> - Tom
>>
>>
>> On Oct 30, 2013, at 8:24 AM, Andrew Darby wrote:
>>
>>> Hello, all.  This is perhaps a bit off-topic, but I was wondering
>>> how
>> many
>>> of you have a dedicated usability person as part of your development
>> team.
>>> Right now, we have a sort of ad hoc Usability Team, and I'd like to
>>> make
>> a
>>> pitch for hiring someone who will have the time and inclination to
>>> manage this effort more effectively.
>>>
>>> Anything you'd care to share (on-list or off-) would be welcome.
>>> I'm especially curious about whether or not this is a full-time
>> responsibility
>>> for someone in your organization or if it's shared with another job
>>> function; if you find this position is working out well or you wish
>>> you'd spent the money on more robots instead; where this person
>>> resides in your org chart; what sort of qualifications you looked for when hiring; etc.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andrew Darby
>>> Head, Web & Emerging Technologies
>>> University of Miami Libraries
>>


-- 
Shaun Ellis
User Interface Developer, Digital Initiatives
Princeton University Library
609.258.1698

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager