Hugh, I'm skeptical of this in a usable application or interface.
Applications have constraints. There are predicates you care about, there
are values you display in specific ways. There are expectations, based on
the domain, in the data that are either driven by the interface or the
needs of the consumers.
I have yet to see an example of "arbitrary and unexpected data" exposed in
an application that people actually use.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Hugh Cayless <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> The answer is purely because the RDF data model and the technology around
> it looks like it would almost do what we need it to.
> I do not, and cannot, assume a closed world. The open world assumption is
> one of the attractive things about RDF, in fact :-)
> On Nov 6, 2013, at 11:11 , Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > My question for you, however, is why are you using a triple store for
> > That is, why bother with the broad and general model in what I assume is
> > closed world assumption in your application?