On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Jon Phipps <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]
> >wrote:
>
> > > All in my opinion, and all debatable. I hope that your choice goes well
> > > for
> > > > you,
> > >
> > > I'd like to repeat: just because I agree with that choice, and I'm
> > > defending it here, it wasn't my choice. Not at all. And the concerns
> you
> > > express were well-aired and very carefully considered before the choice
> > was
> > > made.
> >
> > And yours :)
>
> Ok, that makes me feel a bit personally defensive...
>


Apologies!  It was too much shorthand.  I meant that your concerns were
well-aired, and well explained, in this thread :)

Rob