" xx""DQ : wools x
On Jan 25, 2014 4:20 PM, "Robert Sanderson" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Jon Phipps <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > > All in my opinion, and all debatable. I hope that your choice goes
> well
> > > > for
> > > > > you,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to repeat: just because I agree with that choice, and I'm
> > > > defending it here, it wasn't my choice. Not at all. And the concerns
> > you
> > > > express were well-aired and very carefully considered before the
> choice
> > > was
> > > > made.
> > >
> > > And yours :)
> >
> > Ok, that makes me feel a bit personally defensive...
> >
>
>
> Apologies! It was too much shorthand. I meant that your concerns were
> well-aired, and well explained, in this thread :)
>
> Rob
>
|