LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  January 2014

CODE4LIB January 2014

Subject:

Re: archiving web pages

From:

L Snider <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:10:01 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (60 lines)

As an archivist, I don't see any problem using a PDF. Technically it should
be a PDF-A, but realistically it is usually a PDF.

I have done projects where I used PDFs for the archiving of full websites.
It can be quite handy, depending on needs of course. Sometimes it works
with the look and feel/design, and sometimes it doesn't. Content is pretty
good usually, in my experience.

Do a test and see whether your site crashes your Adobe product...sometimes
the code, special effects or just size can crash it without a PDF being
made...Plus look at the levels you want captured, that can also cause a
mess too.

Cheers

Lisa

-- 
Lisa Snider
Electronic Records Archivist
Harry Ransom Center
The University of Texas at Austin
P.O. Box 7219
Austin, Texas 78713-7219
P: 512-232-4616
www.hrc.utexas.edu



On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Kathryn Frederick (Library) <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Thanks for the thoughtful responses. We've been actively digitizing our
> print paper (which ceased publication in 2011) and I was thinking of this
> as an extension of that effort. Right now, I think capturing a monthly WARC
> file of the site is definitely a good idea no matter what. But beyond that,
> as Kyle pointed out, it's not really the web site I'm after but the
> content. I'd like to present this content alongside print issues in our IR
> (currently ContentDM). In one sense, I can see doing a weekly capture of
> the site which would equate to an issue in the old format. But, I could
> also do a PDF of the content. A PDF makes sense to me in the context of a
> collection that is largely print-based and gets at what I want (keyword
> searchable content, authors, dates), but is it disingenuous to
> fundamentally alter the format? Plus there's the work involved... This may
> be a question for archivists, but I'm not one so would appreciate any
> additional thoughts from this group.
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Kathryn Frederick (Library) <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I'm trying to develop a strategy for preserving issues our school's
> online
> > newspaper. Creating a WARC file of the content seems straightforward, but
> > how will that content fair long-term? Also, how is the WARC served to an
> > end-user? Is there some other method I should look at?
> > Thanks in advance for any advice!
> > Kathryn
> >
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager