Kudos to the team for a great job. The "CODE" play on the "LOVE" sculpture
and Franklin in sunglasses get a special mention. However, I wonder what
this might mean for preservation? In the past, when conferences have
created a we site for an individual conference they have often ended up
disappearing eventually. Did the team consider that? Are there any measures
being put in place to assure that it won't also eventually disappear? Just
wondering, as a speaker who has mourned the passing of past conference web
sites, as if they had never happened.
Roy

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Shaun Ellis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dear Code4Lib,
> We are happy to announce the official 2016 Code4Lib Conference Website!
>
> http://2016.code4lib.org
>
> It's important to note that the wiki is still there, and it will be used
> heavily, particularly by volunteers, documentarians, and organizers of the
> conference.  However, several issues prompted us to create a stand-alone
> conference site, which is focused towards our attendee and sponsor
> audiences.
>
> One reason for the new site is that many people have had difficulty
> finding information on the wiki, exacerbated by the wiki's often slow
> response time and the fact that the wiki and Drupal sites look very similar
> and can lead to confusion.  The wiki is an unconventional for the context,
> and is not optimized for mobile, which is becoming a necessity at
> conferences.
>
> Also, we want to put our best foot forward.  Sponsorships are the main way
> we can keep registration costs to a minimum and offer the best possible
> program.  We felt it was necessary to "level up our window display" for
> approaching new sponsors who may not be familiar with our community.
>
> This does not mean that we are shunning collaboration!  The site is a work
> in progress and hosted on GitHub, so we encourage everyone to help make it
> awesome.  If you see something that should be changed or could be better,
> create an issue.[1]  Better yet, read up on how to make a pull request and
> be a rock star![2]
>
> [1] https://github.com/code4lib/2016.code4lib.org/issues
> [2] https://github.com/code4lib/2016.code4lib.org/wiki
>
> A few final technical details about this site experiment:
>
> First, basic site styles and colors are built via Less, so these templates
> can be easily re-used for future conferences.  Also, the site uses Jekyll
> and much of the content (currently Speakers, Presentations, and
> Testimonials) is supplied via data files (.yml).  This could be extended to
> sponsors, registered attendees, etc.  So, we recommend committees gather
> structured data, instead of using the wiki, for anything they want to post
> to the site.  Furthermore, structured data will also be easier to load into
> the Diebold-o-matic voting app (do you really want to make Chris Beer have
> to cut and paste data in 2016?!?)! If you are on a committee that collects
> data, the Website Committee will be happy to help you set up your forms.
>
> Cheers,
> Shaun Ellis, on behalf of
> The 2016 Code4Lib Conference Website Committee:
>
>  Charlie Morris (Penn State)
>  Junior Tidal (New York City College of Technology)
>  Bill McMillin (Pratt Institute)
>  Shaun Ellis (Princeton University Library)
>  Eric Phetteplace (Cal College of the Arts)
>  Sarah Shealy (Greenville (SC) County Public Library)
>  Jennifer Colt (Cornell University Library)
>  Luke Aeschleman (UNC - Chapel Hill | Health Sciences Library)
>  Ryan Wick (OSU)
>  ... with thanks to Chad Nelson for his contributions too.
>
>
> --
> Shaun Ellis
> User Interface Developer, Digital Initiatives
> Princeton University Library
> 609.258.1698
>