On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Becky Yoose <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Apologies for the short reply with my manager's hat firmly in place -
> transparency is good, but there are times when a particular process or
> discussion should not be public. Given the sensitive nature of some of the
> feedback that might be presented about particular individuals, transparency
> would not be a good fit for the feedback process.
For clarity, am I correct in understanding we are collecting feedback only
on those volunteering to become duty officers, and not on those who
compile/manage harassment information nor on those responsible for
determining what actions to take in response to incidents of harassment?