It saddens me that something so obviously intrinsic to this organization is
thought to be necessary. Usually an organization issues such a statement
because their practices along such lines have been called into question,
not because of the result of an election.
Btw, what about Luddites, Trump supporters and those who would want the
whole world to program in COBOL? Are we to be as accepting of those
philistines as well? ;-)
Peace, love and light to all! (no, really)
Coordinator of Computer Systems
100 Martine Avenue
White Plains, NY 10601
*When you think about it, *all* security is ultimately security by
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Michelle Lubatti <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Is it really necessary for this list to affirm that it stands by
> diversity? I have not encountered any negativity on this email list
> myself. Are others experiencing this? I am saddened to think that others
> are experiencing hurtful or bullying comments on this email list. :(
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Junior Tidal <[log in to unmask]>
> > I think that's a great idea.
> > Best,
> > Junior
> > >>> "Kim, Bohyun" <[log in to unmask]> 11/14/16 4:05 PM >>>
> > Hi Code4Libbers,
> > What do you think about issuing a post-election statement on diversity
> > basically affirming that we stand by it?
> > If that _IS_ the majority opinion in Code4Lib which I am _POSITIVE_ that
> > it is, then I want to hear it and I think others may well!
> > I just drafted one for LITA (to be out tomorrow hopefully). So I have
> > wordings that I can offer as a starting point.
> > Thoughts?
> > Thanks,
> > Bohyun