On Jul 25, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Eric Hellman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> To follow up on Andromeda's calling the question, we need to do some things in addition to the usual dieboldotron.
> 
> 1. There's a point of fact that is still being disputed/discussed: whether formalization is required by potential fiscal sponsor. It's straightforward to answer this before any poll is conducted -  ask the potential fiscal sponsors to weigh in on the question.

Hasn't that been settled by Bohyun's message yesterday?

> On Jul 24, 2017, at 6:36 PM, Kim, Bohyun <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Jonathan is right, Cary. I am on this year's LPC for the next year's C4L conference at DC, and we are already working with DLF as a fiscal sponsor. No legal entity status was required.


Or is there some question that the requirements may be different for a long-term fiscal sponsorship, as opposed to a one-time sponsorship?

-Esmé