Good thought, but given that the image is 2400x3140 and many of the numbers
are much higher I can't make that make sense. I'm wondering if there is
some sort of scaling algorithm going on, or if I've just gone down a very
dark rabbit hole.....
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 9:58 AM Joshua Westgard <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Could the coordinates be the x/y for the upper left corner, followed by
> horizontal and vertical offsets to describe the location of the other
> corner? That seems like it might work just based on the numbers.