I think the constraint is that it has to be a rational number. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Eric
Hellman
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:58 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] mailing list administratativia

I vote for changing the limit threshold to 

         PI * (eventual length of this meta-thread).

On Oct 27, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Alexander Johannesen wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Doran, Michael D <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Can that limit threshold be raised?  If so, are there reasons why it
should not be raised?
> 
> Is it to throttle spam or something? 50 seems rather low, and it's 
> rather depressing to have a lively discussion throttled like that. Not 
> to mention I thought I was simply kicked out for living things up 
> (especially given my reasonable follow-up was where the throttling 
> began).
> 
> Alex
> --
>  Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic 
> Maps
> --- http://shelter.nu/blog/ 
> ----------------------------------------------
> ------------------ http://www.google.com/profiles/alexander.johannesen 
> ---

Eric Hellman
President, Gluejar, Inc.
41 Watchung Plaza, #132
Montclair, NJ 07042
USA

[log in to unmask]
http://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/
@gluejar