LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  October 2010

CODE4LIB October 2010

Subject:

Fwd: [NGC4LIB] CSU library finds 40% of collection hasn't circulated

From:

Cindy Harper <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:59:41 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (126 lines)

Colgate University built an on-site ASRS in 2005 as part of renovating our
entire main library.  During the 2 years of construction on the building,
our services were dispersed among several buildings on campus and the
high-use portion of the collection that remained available to our students
during that  time was entirely housed in the ASRS, requested through our
online catalog, and delivered to our circulation point in utility vehicle
loads. Of course, we also made major use of the ConnectNY user-initiated
resource sharing and traditional ILL.  There was user dissatisfaction at
first, but one thing we learned is that patrons were greatly pleased when we
made a public awareness campaign to show them how to virtually browse the
stacks in call-number order using the OPAC.  The other thing we heard when
we moved back into our renovated building was that students were
disappointed that they had to go to the stacks and find the books
themselves! And faculty were disappointed when we stopped delivering
directly to their offices, of course - but we want them to come to the
library :) .  When we opened the new building, we brought up the Encore
discovery system, and blended it into the classic OPAC site as our keyword
search (classic indexes are still available in other tabs). Encore doesn't
have a virtual call number browse feature, but we have asked for this as an
enhancement - either a linear browse of the shelves, or a hierarchical call
number facet drill-down.

Cindy Harper, Systems Librarian
Colgate University Libraries
[log in to unmask]
315-228-7363




On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Emily Lynema <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I agree with Dan that it is a bit of a moot point to argue about the
> benefits of moving materials to off-site storage. It is absolutely going to
> happen. But here's the thing....it's been happening for years as we buy more
> and more e-books and digital collections. If the argument is that users need
> to be able to 'browse' the physical stacks, they've already been unable to
> discover digital materials in this way for some time now.
>
> But here's where I think this topic does tie in with NGC4LIB. The question
> we should be asking ourselves is "What are our patrons losing when we move
> our physical print materials off-site? Are there tools we can build to help
> them recover that usefulness in new ways?"
>
> It's for that exact reason that we are continuing to explore different,
> enriched ways to browse the collection virtually at NCSU, in addition to
> thinking about what enhanced delivery services we can offer to our patrons
> to make it easier and more reliable to get a book out of an automated
> retrieval system than it was to go find it in the stacks.
>
> I bet there are a lot of cool new discovery tools we could think about that
> way make both digital collections AND materials stored off-site accessible
> to our patrons.
> As for the use case that Tim pointed out, it seems like those materials
> should have been part of a reference collection of some sort. It goes
> without saying that as libraries contemplate major changes like these, our
> job is to be listening to our patrons so that we can learn what mistakes we
> might have made and remedy them. An interesting idea that has been tossed
> around here is to retain on open browsing shelves the materials most
> recently pulled from the ARS. Perhaps that would need to include materials
> most frequently pulled from the ARS, too.
>
> -emily
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:46:24 -0400
> From:    Dan Scott <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: CSU library finds 40% of collection hasn't circulated
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Kyle Banerjee <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>  >>
>>> >> "We're going to move out the books that are never checked out, the
>>> ones
>>> >> that are never used anymore,"
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>> >
>> > I hope they're not relying exclusively on circ transaction data to
>> discover
>> > what is "never used." I realize this may sound insane, but a lot of
>> > materials are actually used *in the library* without being checked out.
>> The
>> > nature of the resource and the people who have a lot to do with this.
>> >
>> > Years ago, we did a major weeding and storage project at a place I
>> worked at
>> > did something similar. Just to be safe, we had the shelvers look at our
>> > proposed list which contained 10's of thousands of items to see if any
>> of
>> > them jumped out as things they recognized as materials that were used.
>> While
>> > most were not, there were certainly a number that were.
>>
>>
>
> That's not at all insane. In fact, we use our next-generation ILS
> (Evergreen - did y'all catch that valiant attempt to link this thread
> to the supposed topic of the mailing list?) to record in-house uses,
> and when we did our own PR-free move of items from the stuffed
> circulation stacks into storage this summer, we used a combination of
> lack of circulation since 1985 and lack of recorded in-house uses
> since 2003 to determine likely suspects for movement into storage.
>
> Of course, some patrons disobey the signs posted all around the
> library asking them not to reshelve the books and slip books back onto
> the shelves by themselves, evading an in-house-use statistic, but at
> some point you just have to accept that there is a possibility that
> one of those books will show up in your next generation catalogue with
> "Storage" in the copy location information and they'll have to ask
> someone to retrieve it for them. It seemed like a worthwhile risk for
> us to take, in return for breathing room on our stacks.
>
> -- Dan Scott Laurentian University
>
> --
> Emily Lynema
> Associate Department Head
> Information Technology, NCSU Libraries
> 919-513-8031
> [log in to unmask]
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager