TDB as per the startup instruction: "fuseki-server --loc=DB
/DatasetPathName"

Ethan


On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On Feb 20, 2013, at 2:52 PM, Ethan Gruber <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Hugh,
> >
> > I have investigated the possibility of deploying Fuseki as a war in
> Tomcat (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-201) because I wasn't sure
> how
> > the default Jetty container would respond in production, but since you
> > aren't having any problems with that deployment, I may go ahead and do
> that.
>
> Fuseki/Jetty will have no problems scaling, it's what the Talis Platform
> used for large datasets.  I also ran a large dataset for quite a while with
> it.
>
> Which backend are you using?  TDB?  SDB?
>
> -Ross.
>
> >
> > Ethan
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Hugh Cayless <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Ethan!
> >>
> >> We've been using Jena/Fuseki in papyri.info for about a year now, iirc.
> >> We started with Mulgara, but switched. It's running in its own Jetty
> >> container in our system, but I've had no performance issues with it
> >> whatever.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Hugh
> >>
> >> On Feb 20, 2013, at 14:31 , Ethan Gruber <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I have been playing around with Fuseki (
> >>> http://jena.apache.org/documentation/serving_data/index.html) for a
> few
> >>> months to get my feet wet with accessing and querying RDF.  I quite
> like
> >>> it. I find it well documented and easy to set up.  We will soon deploy
> a
> >>> SPARQL server in a production environment, and I would like to know if
> >>> others on the list have experience with Fuseki in production, or have
> >> other
> >>> recommendations.  Mulgara is off the table as it inexplicably conflicts
> >>> with other apps installed in Tomcat.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Ethan
> >>
>